The Effect of Participatory Leadership, Work Discipline, and Motivation on the Professional Competence of Teachers at SDS Muhammadiyah 1 Menganti Gresik

Authors

  • I Nyoman Sujapa Universitas Ngurah Rai Denpasar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v24i2.1134

Keywords:

social media, evaluation tools, public policy

Abstract

In the digital era like today, social media is developing very rapidly and has become a platform that can be used for various communication purposes and goals, including evaluating public policies. Through it, public participation in national life becomes more widespread and intensive. Public policy evaluation helps ensure that the policies implemented truly meet the needs of the community. This study aims to explore how social media can be used as a tool for evaluating public policies. With a qualitative approach and documentation study, this study. formulates the results, namely that social media has a significant role as a tool for evaluating public policies. Through platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, the public can express opinions, criticisms, and suggestions regarding the policies implemented. Data shows that 60% of social media users actively participate in discussions on policy issues, which reflects high involvement. Social media not only functions as a communication channel, but also as a valuable source of data for policy makers to understand public perceptions and assess the impact of policies that have been implemented. The importance of social media in public policy evaluation lies in its ability to provide fast and direct feedback from the public, as well as expand the reach of public participation in the decision-making process.
Keywords: social media, evaluation tools, public policy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boulianne, S. (2019). "Social Media Use and Participation: A Meta-Analysis."Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.

Digital 2023. "DataReportal: Global Overview Report 2023."

Friggeri, A., et al. (2014). "Rumor Cascades." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Goh, G., et al. (2020). "Social Media as a Tool for Public Health Research: A Systematic Review." Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Hidayati, N., & Susanto, H. (2021). "The Impact of Social Media on Public Health Campaigns: A Case Study of COVID-19 in Indonesia." Health Communication.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. Pew Research Center. (2021). "Social Media Use in 2021."

Mavrot, C., Potluka, O., Balzer, L., Eicher, V., Haunberger, S., Heuer, C., & Viallon, F.-X. (2025). What evaluation criteria are used in policy evaluation research: A cross-field literature review. Evaluation and Program Planning, 108, 102512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102512

Rahman, A. (2023). "Evaluating Waste Management Policies through Social Media Feedback." Environmental Policy and Governance.

Setiawan, R., & Prabowo, A. (2022). "Crisis Management in Urban Flooding: The Role of Social Media." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

Simonofski, A., Fink, J., & Burnay, C. (2021). Supporting policy-making with social media and e-participation platforms data: A policy analytics framework. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101590

Smith, A. (2021). "The Digital Divide: A Study of Internet Access in Rural Areas." Journal of Community Informatics.

Statista. (2023). Distribution of social media users worldwide as of January 2023, by age group. Retrieved from [Statista] (https://www.statista.com/ statistics/272014/age-distribution-of-global-social-network-users/).

We Are Social & Hootsuite. (2023). Digital 2023: Global Overview Report. Retrieved from [We Are Social](https://wearesocial.com/digital-2023).

Weng, S., Schwarz, G., Schwarz, S., & Hardy, B. (2021). A framework for government response to social media participation in public policy making: Evidence from China. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(16), 1424–1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1852569

Villodre, J. (2025). A three-model approach to understand social media-mediated transparency in public administrations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 91(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523241261896

Downloads

Published

04-08-2026

How to Cite

I Nyoman Sujapa. (2026). The Effect of Participatory Leadership, Work Discipline, and Motivation on the Professional Competence of Teachers at SDS Muhammadiyah 1 Menganti Gresik. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 24(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.63309/dialektika.v24i2.1134